Main menu
Common skin conditions
NEWS
Join DermNet PRO
Read more
Quick links
Last Reviewed: August, 2025
Author: Mr Jamie Banks, Surgical Registrar, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, St George’s University Hospitals, London, United Kingdom (2025)
Peer reviewed by: Dr Allison Goldenstein, Resident Dermatology Physician, Northeast Regional Medical Center, Missouri, USA (2025); Nancy Huang (MBChB), DermNet Medical Writer, NZ (2025)
Previous contributor: Vanessa Ngan, Staff Writer (2002)
Reviewing dermatologist: Dr Ian Coulson
Edited by the DermNet content department.
Introduction
Uses and techniques
Contraindications
How it works
Benefits
Complications
Outcomes
Fat grafting is a procedure which removes excess fat cells from one area of the body, commonly the abdomen or thighs, and then reimplants it where needed.
Other names for fat grafting include autologous fat transfer (AFT) and lipofilling.
Fat grafting can be used for correcting or improving:
There are different types of fat grafting based on the particle size of transferred fat:
In addition to adding volume, fat grafting is also utilised to improve tissue quality or reduce pain and other functional complaints eg, in radiation dermatitis, burns, post-mastectomy pain syndrome, and breast implant capsular contraction.
Contraindications:
Cautions:
The fat grafting procedure can last a few hours and is typically completed as an outpatient day case. If fat grafting is performed as part of a larger surgical procedure, an overnight hospital stay may be required. If large areas are being treated, the process can be split across multiple sessions.
Fat grafting consists of three main stages:
1. Harvesting
This step involves preparation of the site of fat removal using a local anaesthetic and removal of the fat via suction through a small incision.
There are several harvesting methods, but a common approach utilises liposuction with a wetting solution — a mix of a crystalloid fluid, local anaesthetic, and vasoconstrictor. The most common method is called tumescent liposuction, which infiltrates tissue with large volumes of wetting solution.
Emerging techniques are exploring direct fat excision, where fat is surgically removed rather than suctioned. While early trials show promise, these methods are not widely adopted at present.
2. Processing/purification
The harvested fat undergoes processing to eliminate impurities (eg, free oils, cellular debris, blood, and fluid) as these can induce inflammation at the recipient site and undermine graft survival. Common processing techniques include centrifugation, filtration, washing, and sedimentation.
The degree of processing depends on whether macrofat, microfat, or nanofat grafting is utilised.
3. Injection
The recipient site is prepped and fat is injected in small aliquots using another cannula or needle into the area. This process is repeated until the desired correction has been achieved.
After the procedure
A follow-up visit is arranged approximately one week after the procedure to assess both the donor and recipient sites. Most of the swelling is expected to resolve within 6–8 weeks, at which point early results may be visible. A revision procedure may be required if the desired outcome has not been achieved, but this should not be performed within 3 months of the first graft.
A key advantage of fat grafting over other soft-tissue fillers is its biocompatibility. By using fat that is autologous (comes from your own body), the risk of hypersensitivity or foreign body reactions is minimised.
Other benefits:
Emerging evidence suggests that adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) within the grafted may enhance and promote regeneration of tissues.
Like any surgery, fat grafting carries potential risks.
The exact survival rate of fat grafts is not definitively known. During the first year, anywhere from 30% to 70% of the grafted fat can be reabsorbed by the body.
Fat grafts generally last longer in larger areas with limited movement. For example, fat grafting can effectively correct undereye grooves and sunken cheeks, but it may not be a suitable technique for lip augmentation due to the area’s high mobility.
The amount resorbed and therefore the longevity appear to depend heavily on the grafting technique used. Newer techniques, such as cell-assisted lipotransfer (CAL), are being developed to increase longevity. For longer-lasting results, patients may receive three or four treatments over a period of six months to a year.